Oscar Wilde wrote: “With age comes wisdom, but sometimes age comes alone.”
I recently had a very in-depth philosophical discussion with a good friend and associate, a fascinating discussion, regarding the change and disruption of leadership’s perspectives in wisdom
I have written on the subject of The four Intelligences; IQ, EI, SI, DI and why we need Wisdom Intelligence (WI)
For most of human history, age and experience were assumed to bestow wisdom, and wisdom was assumed to be a good thing. Youthful genius has been recognized since ancient times, but it wasn’t wisdom’s competitor. A figure like Isaac Newton, whose breakthroughs in optics, calculus, and physics all came in his twenties, or brilliant young poets like Thomas Chatterton and Rupert Brooke, were seen as possessed of an inborn, uncontrollable, even divine genius.
Besides, youthful genius hardly figured outside science and art. A mathematician like Evariste Galois might do paradigm-shattering work by twenty, but building fortunes and businesses required years of patience, prudence, and occasional boldness. In larger enterprises, you rose, not leapt, to the top: you paid your dues, did the work, and waited your turn.
In politics, a brilliant start was a sign of a promising career: Thomas Jefferson and William Gladstone were both recognized as stellar minds, but their political careers still unfolded over decades. The professions required both up-to-date knowledge and experience: a great physician or lawyer had to know the latest developments in their fields, but also possess the maturity that came only from years of practice. Across all these realms, greatness required maturity and wisdom, which could not be learned, only acquired.
Wisdom is the art of knowing what really matters and making good decisions to improve our own well-being and, more importantly, that of others. There lies the real key.
The quest for wisdom is an age-old effort. It’s one many have recommended.
It’s been said to be as useful for finding inner contentment as it for fueling external successes. It’s a more prudent way of interacting with reality.
While not everyone’s definition of wisdom is the same, it doesn’t seem too far-fetched to distinguish it by a mode of deeper understanding. One that goes beyond just the knowing we commonly associate with the range of intelligence’s; IQ,EI, SI, DI.
When we think of the acquisition of intelligence, we think of new information inspired by a perspective-shift that tells us a truth about one aspect of reality.
Wisdom goes further than that. It strips that same information down to its essence so that it can relate the underlying principle of that knowledge to the existing information network that exists in the mind.
It’s the connectedness of this network that separates it from mere intelligence.
The more links between each pocket of information, the more valuable the whole network will be when tackling any other problem. It adds an extra dimension to each mental model contained in the mind.
Simply knowing this doesn’t make a person more equipped to soak in wisdom, but with awareness and practice, new thinking patterns and imagination can be created.
Machine intelligence is undeniably becoming a significant part of our lives. Artificial intelligence (AI) aims to create an intelligent machine with human-like functionalities. Intelligent machines, now equipped with a learning model, make decisions, and humans living in this world benefit from their assistance, whether it is clinical diagnostics, an independent vehicle, a framework that determines whether we get credit or not, and so on The unparalleled speed with which the field of AI is advancing and showing its impact on different domains of life is marked by growing concerns.
AI-enthusiasts suggest that AI will be developed to augment human efficiency however, intellectuals and the common man are worried about the possibility of AI taking over humans As it is said, ‘good for us, to God for us,’ the potentially catastrophic risk comes with having an AI system that learns from data alone.
Human wisdom and artificial intelligence will enhance each other’s comprehension and utility and can support each other’s development. Thus, the AI models should be built to preserve our human qualities, decision-making, and moral aspirations, or probably the best parts of our beliefs. Therefore, fabricating Artificial Wisdom (AW)
advancements will require broad cooperation among computer scientists, neuroscientists, psychologists, and ethicists In simpler terms, AW will reflect the characteristics of wise people.
AI may be perfect in doing certain performances such as writing an essay, but it cannot substitute, say, for the musical performance of a child which is appreciated and encouraged by relatives and friends. This kind of human interaction is what makes us humans grow as persons, having bodies and staying in multi-modal interactions with others.
The acceleration of capitalism and the growth of the technosphere has not only diminished the space for life on Earth but has also shrunk the domains where we can live these interactions, such as extensive ritual practices of communities engaging all senses. If we can make AI productive and create resources to counter these malicious trends, so be it. Human wisdom will reign over artificial intelligence.
Historically, the boss typically has been older than the staff. But in the last few decades, several trends converged that made it more common for employees to have younger managers. One catalyst is the shift from seniority-based promotions toward those based on merit, according to a research article in the Journal of Organizational Behavior. Also, as the pace of technology innovation increases, companies promote more tech-savvy younger workers into supervisory jobs. Meanwhile, older workers are staying employed longer due to such things as the disappearance of early retirement schemes.
We’re in the midst of two enormous demographic shifts in the workplace that seem to be at odds with each other.
We’re living longer and working longer either by choice or necessity. In the last century, the 65+ age group has grown five times faster than the rest of the population and, by 2031, according to a recent Bain & Co. estimate, employees 55 and older will constitute a quarter of the global workforce.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, nearly half of the increase in the number of people participating in the U.S. labor force between 2016 and 2026 is attributable to those 60 and older.
Anupam Kher, who is a successful actor and gold medallist, reached out to his grandfather, seeking guidance. He asked, “Dadaji, why am I going through such a tough time? I just want to go back to Shimla.” His response was a game-changer: “Beta, you’ve worked so hard to get where you are, and your parents have also supported you.
Remember one thing, ‘Bheega hua aadmi baarish se nahi darta’” (A man who is drenched is not afraid of rain.)
This timeless piece of advice from his grandfather profoundly shifted his perspective. It taught the value of resilience and the strength that adversity can build within us.
He went on to share that throughout his career, he had faced numerous storms, but learned to embrace them with open arms, understanding that each challenge is an opportunity for growth. He said I am grateful for the wisdom my grandfather shared and for the life lessons that have come my way.
I recently watched Anupam in “New Amsterdam”, an American medical drama television series, based on the book Twelve Patients: Life and Death at Bellevue Hospital by Eric Manheimer. The series aired on NBC, with 89 episodes over five seasons. One of America’s oldest hospitals welcomes a new maverick director in Dr. Max Goodwin, who sets out to reform the institution’s neglected and outdated facilities to treat patients and saves lives.
The Cast Ryan Eggold – Dr. Max Goodwin, Jocko Sims – Dr. Floyd Reynolds, Freema Agyeman – Dr. Helen Sharpe, Janet Montgomery- Dr. Lauren Bloom, Tyler Labine – Dr. Iggy Frome, Anupam Kher – Dr. Vijay Kapoor
Series 2 Episode 1 Your Turn
Max works to find a new normal three months after the accident and the birth of his daughter; Kapoor grapples with the stigma of age vs wisdom; Iggy has a successful day that inspires a life-changing idea; Reynolds deals with a new intern.
Companies should recognize that they lose by worshipping youth and discounting experience. When venture capitalists “let young founders go it alone” and run companies rather than pair youthful founders with industry veterans: the consequences have been predictably disastrous.
Young male founders hire young male employees, and spend huge money building kooky office frat houses…. This huge, dynamic industry, which is generating so much wealth, has walled itself off from most of the workforce, telling millions of people that they cannot participate.
This situation obviously shortchanges a lot of workers, but it also hurts tech companies by depriving them of talent.
There’s also a case to be made that discarding or excluding older workers deprives an industry of valuable talent and experience, and actually makes it narrower, less innovative, and even less entrepreneurial. The disappearance of an older generation of executives has meant that industries as a whole is taken less seriously by its clients, overestimates the novelty of every new technology, and lacks the perspective to differentiate noisy events from deep and truly meaningful changes.
Aziz Shamim argues that rather than creating products to eliminate disease, end poverty, or educate the poor, today youthful “tech culture is focused on solving one problem: What is my mother no longer doing for me?” A decade ago, business professor Vivek Wadhwa is an Indian-American technology entrepreneur and academic who studied tech company founders, and found that the most successful were in their late thirties or older. More recently, work by the Kauffman Foundation concluded that successful entrepreneurs are actually getting older: they’re increasingly likely to be in their fifties or even sixties.
Further, history teaches us that industry is exactly where it needs to be in which people are able to make contributions throughout their lives. Creativity come in two kinds: young geniuses who make conceptual breakthroughs, and old masters whose work matures over decades. This holds true in art, music, movie, and even economics. The world would be poorer if it only recognized Van Gogh and Picasso, and ignored Rembrandt and Vermeer.
Finally, we should recognize that creativity lives can be long, and that even youthful prodigies have surprising second acts. Clint Eastwood’s legacy will probably rest less on his roles as Rawhide’s Rowdy Yates or “Dirty Harry” Callahan, and more on his work as a director, which has been his main focus since he turned seventy in 2000.
Had Steve Jobs not had a second act in his fifties, the world might never have seen the iPod, iPad, and iPhone. No one ever argued that Lord of the Rings would have been awesome if only it had appeared when J.R.R. Tolkien was in his twenties, rather than his sixties. Lord of the Rings wouldn’t have been better if written by a younger, less experienced J.R.R. Tolkien.
For all these reasons, it’s high time to rethink our preference for youth and disdain for wisdom. The world needs, and should be able to make room for, both.
The great Aristotle once stated when discussing Metaphysics :
“It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.